THE ACTION RESEARCH FOR PROMOTION THE INTERN EXPERIENCE’S STUDENT OF THAI LANGUAGE TEACHING IN THE METACOGNITIVE DEVELOPMENT OF STUDENTS STUDYING THAI LANGUAGE
Main Article Content
Abstract
The purposes of this research were (1) to study the use of action research to promote professional Thai language professional teacher experience practicing students’ metacognition development of students studying Thai language; (2) to assess metacognition of students studying Thai language; and (3) to study the relationship of metacognition and learning achievement of students studying Thai language. The target group consisted of 5 fifth year students who were undertaking the teacher professional experience practicum in the Thai Language Program of the Faculty of Education, Chiang Mai University; and 225 secondary school students in five classrooms, each of which containing 45 students, of five schools where
the student teachers had their practicum during the 2019 academic year. The instruments used to collect data were (1) a knowledge adjustment training plan for professional experience practicing students and mentors; (2) a quality verification form for learning management plans using metacognitive strategies of professional experience practicing students; (3) a teaching supervision form for supervision of practicing student’s teaching with the use of metacognitive strategies; (4) a reflective thinking form for professional experience practicing students; (5) a student’s metacognition measurement and evaluation form; (6) a student’s metacognition observation form; (7) a test of student’s learning achievement, (8) a reflective thinking form for students learning with the use of metacognitive strategies; and (9) a student interview form. The researcher designed and planned the research using the action research process which was the use of PAOR circuits or Plan-Act-Observe-Reflect. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics including the mean, standard deviation, percentage, Pearson product–moment correlation coefficient, and effect size; while qualitative data were analyzed with descriptive narration method. Research findings could be concluded as follows:
1. The results of using action research to promote professional Thai language professional teacher experience practicing students’ metacognition development of students studying Thai language is the use of PAOR circuits or Plan-Act-Observe-Reflect. In the development of students, the process was divided into 3 main circuits, which were circuit 1: organizing a seminar training to adjust the students’ background knowledge; circuit 2: creating and developing instructional management plans; and circuit 3: actual teaching practice.
2. Regarding the metacognition assessment results of students in Thai language, when the total score was considered, it was found that the students’ post-learning metacognition mean score was 3.99, which was 79.80 % of the total score. Also, the students post-learning metacognition mean score was increased over their pre-learning counterpart mean score with the overall size effect (d) of 0.32, which was considered as increasing at the moderate level.
3. The correlation coefficients of learning achievement and metacognition scores of students in the five schools ranged from 0.25 to 0.68, which were at the low to moderate levels.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
I and co-author(s) certify that articles of this proposal had not yet been published and is not in the process of publication in journals or other published sources. I and co-author accept the rules of the manuscript consideration. Both agree that the editors have the right to consider and make recommendations to the appropriate source. With this rights offering articles that have been published to Panyapiwat Institute of Management. If there is a claim of copyright infringement on the part of the text or graphics that appear in the article. I and co-author(s) agree on sole responsibility.
References
Hartman, H. J. (2001). Teaching Metacognitively. In H. J. Hartman (Ed.), Metacognition in Learning and Instruction: Theory, Research and Practice. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Jadkrathok, S., Na Nakorn, N., Chutinuntakul, S., Phonapichat, P., & Sittirit, P. (2016). The Development of a Scale to Measure and Assess Metacognition of Primary and Secondary School Students. Bangkok: National Institute of Educational Testing Service
(Public Organization).
Kajorn, A. (2017). The Development of Instructional Packages to Support Learning Management of Co–operative Learning on the Topic “Lilittalengpai”, of the Thai Language Department for Matayom Suksa 5 Students. Academic Journal of Mahamakut Budddhist University Roi Et Campus, 6(1), 1-11. [in Thai]
Kemmis, S. & McTaggart, R. (1988). The Action Reacher Planer. Victoria: Deakin University.
Schraw, G. & Dennison, R. S. (1994). Assessing Metacognitive Awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19, 460-475.
The Institute for the Promotion of Teaching Science and Technology. (2013). Assessment Results of PISA (Programmed for International Student Assessment) 2012: Mathematic Reading and Science Executive Summary. Bangkok: The Institute for the Promotion of Teaching Science and Technology (IPST). [in Thai]
Vaiyavutjamai, P., Charoenchaia, S., Ponmanee, S., Danpakdee, A., Chotivachira, B., Warotamawit, V., Kamol, N., Pankaew, P., & Sitthiwong, W. (2012). Collaborative Action Research to Promote Reflective Thinking Among Higher Education Students. Retrieved July 7, 2020, from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877042812024639 [in Thai]
Wade-Jaimes, K., Demir, K., & Qureshi, A. (2018). Modeling Strategies Enhanced by Metacognitive Tools in High School Physics to Support Student Conceptual Trajectories and Understanding of Electricity. Science Education, 102, 711-743.
Wagaba, F., Treagust, D. F., Chandrasegaran, A. L., & Won, M. (2016). Using Metacognitive Strategies in Teaching to Facilitate Understanding of Light Concepts among Year 9 Students. Research in Science & Technological Education, 34(3), 253-272.
Wiratchai, N. (2005). Principles of Quantitative Research and Qualitative Research. Retrieved December 4, 2019, from https://www.research10ubru.con/work/nongluk.doc [in Thai]
Wongwanich, S. (2012). Classroom Action Research. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Press. [in Thai]