MARKETING FACTORS INFLUENCING THE DECISION TO PURCHASE PLANT FACTORY WITH ARTIFICIAL LIGHTING (PFAL) SYSTEM IN BANGKOK, THAILAND

Main Article Content

Monruedee Chantharat
Poonsub Srikhachin
Samatcha Chareunklin
Wilas Chamlertwat
Chairat Burana

Abstract

This study examines user adoption behavior regarding Plant Factory with Artificial Lighting  (PFAL) systems and analyzes the marketing mix factors influencing purchase decisions. The  research focuses on three primary segments: eight farmers, seven academic institutions, and ten  real estate enterprises. A purposive sampling technique was applied, and data were collected  through individual structured interviews. The findings reveal that farmers primarily cultivate  lettuce for supermarket distribution, typically operating within 200-500 square meter with  investment budgets ranging from 100,001 to 500,000 THB. Academic institutions aim to adopt  PFAL systems to enhance experiential learning, curriculum development, and publication,  generally maintaining budgets below 500,000 THB. Real estate enterprises seek PFAL investment  to establish unique competitive advantages, with an acceptable investment threshold of 1,000- 2,000 THB per square meter. The analysis of marketing mix factors influencing PFAL purchase  decisions reveals distinct determinants across user groups. Regarding product, the most influential  aspects for farmers include comprehensive training and after-sales services. For the academic  institutions, equipment durability, system lifespan, and guarantees related to crop quality and  system performance are the primary concerns. For the real estate enterprises, flexibility in system  sizing and installation layout, equipment durability, and system performance guarantees are the  most critical product attributes. Regarding price, farmers emphasize Return on Investment (ROI),  cost-effectiveness, and operating and maintenance costs. The academic institutions prioritize  operating and maintenance costs, while the real estate enterprises emphasize cost-effectiveness.  Regarding place, farmers consider convenience of access to distribution and service locations.  The academic institutions require convenient locations with knowledgeable staff. The real  estate enterprises look for broad service coverage with knowledgeable staff. Regarding promotion,  farmers value free maintenance packages and training program. The academic institutions  emphasize free maintenance packages, marketing support, and training program. Similarly, the  real estate enterprises consider free maintenance packages and training program for staffs. 

Article Details

How to Cite
Chantharat, M., Srikhachin, P., Chareunklin, S., Chamlertwat, W., & Burana, C. (2026). MARKETING FACTORS INFLUENCING THE DECISION TO PURCHASE PLANT FACTORY WITH ARTIFICIAL LIGHTING (PFAL) SYSTEM IN BANGKOK, THAILAND. Panyapiwat Journal, 18(1), 19–34. retrieved from https://so05.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/pimjournal/article/view/285464
Section
Research Article

References

Aladjadjiyan, A. (2012). Food production–Approaches, challenges and tasks. IntechOpen.

Despommier, D. (2009). The rise of vertical farms. Scientific American, 301(5), 32-39.

Fang, W. (2016). Business models for Plant Factory with Artificial Lighting (PFAL) in Taiwan. In T. Kozai, K. Fujiwara, & E. Runkle (Eds.), LED lighting for urban agriculture (pp. 289-293). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1848-0_21

Imsa, Y. (2024, December 8). Vertical vegetable farming: Space-saving, water-efficient solution for urban agriculture. Khaosod. https://www.khaosod.co.th/technologychaoban/featured/article_274390 [in Thai]

Jaeger, S. R. (2024). Vertical farm (plant factory with artificial lighting) and its produce: Consumer insights. Current Opinion in Food Science, 56, 101145.

Kozai, T. (2013). Plant factory in Japan: Current situation and perspectives. Chronica Horticulturae, 53(2), 8-11.

Krajangpan, T., Suebtaanaawong, T., & Wangasathiwong, S. (2018). LED lighting design for indoor planting based on daily light integral. Agricultural Science Journal, 49(1), 498-501. [in Thai]

Kupea, M. (2023). The effects of LED artificial lighting on plant growth. Journal of Agricultural Innovation, 9(1), 22-35. [in Thai]

Laopim, A. (2016). Vertical farming and robot farm systems. Organic Farm Thailand. https://www.organicfarmthailand.com/vertical-farm-and-robot-farm [in Thai]

Matichon Weekly. (2024, May 7). Plant factory: A value-adding solution for the development of Thai agriculture. Matichon Weekly. https://www.matichon.co.th/weekly/pr/article_767156 [in Thai]

Mosaleeyanon, K. (2022). Current situation, direction, policy support, and challenges of Plant Factories with Artificial Lighting (PFAL) in Thailand. The FFTC Journal of Agricultural Policy, 3, 46-56.

Sereerat, S., Sereerat, S., Luksitanon, P., Patawanich, A., Meejinda, P., Anuwichanon, J., & Lertwannawit, O. (2009). Marketing management (Revised ed.). Diamond in Business World. [in Thai]

Siam Kubota Corporation Co., Ltd. (2025). Understanding PFAL: Plant Factories with Artificial Lighting, the agricultural technology of the future. Siam Kubota. https://kas.siamkubota.co.th/knowledge [in Thai]

Sramanee, T., Athitanan, P., & Inthasawat, S. (2020). Plant factory industry market status and related research directions. Market Intelligence and Innovation Team (MIIT), Strategy Research and Technology Transfer Division, National Electronics and Computer Technology Center (NECTEC), National Science and Technology Development Agency (NSTDA). [in Thai]

Uno, M., & Kawamitsu, Y. (2017). Design of a plant factory suitable for Okinawa. Engineering and Applied Science Research, 44(3), 182-188.

Watjanatepin, N., & Boonmee, C. (2017). Which color of light from light-emitting diodes is optimal for plant cultivation? Thai Journal of Science and Technology, 25(1), 158-176. [in Thai]

Wichitkosum, S. (2018). Interesting insights: Vertical farming. Environmental Journal, 22(1), 56-63. [in Thai]