The Influence of Integrated Dynamic Capability, Risk Management by Environmental Considerations, Potentiality of Resource Management Towards Green Innovation Management in the Chemical Manufacturing Industry in Thailand
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The purpose of this research was to examine the influence of integrated dynamical capability, Risk Management by Environmental Considerations, and Potentiality of Resource Management towards green innovation management. The study population was executive or business owners in Thailand's manufacturing industry in the category of basic chemicals, chemical fertilizers, nitrogen compounds, and primary plastics and synthetic rubber. The research instrument was a questionnaire, which was mailed to the names and addresses of business owners who were applying for a business license from the Department of Industrial Works. Of these, a total of 269 complete questionnaire returned. The statistics used for data analysis were frequency, percentage, mean, standard deviation, and multiple regression coefficients. The results showed that 1) integrated dynamic capability influenced green innovation management statistically significance at 0.01 level; 2) risk management by environmental considerations influenced Green Innovation Management statistically significantly at the 0.01 level and 3) Potentiality of Resource Management Influencing Green Innovation Management with statistical significance at 0.05 level and all three factors could together predict green innovation management at 75.7 percent.
The results are beneficial for businesses interested in environmentally focused management practices, emphasizing the importance of developing all three factors to enhance the success of green innovation management within their operations.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Every article published in the Romphruek Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences is the opinion and point of view of the authors. Thery're not the viewpoint of Krirk University or the editored department. Any part or all of the articles for pablication must be clearly cited.
References
กระทรวงการอุดมศึกษา วิทยาศาสตร์ วิจัยและนวัตกรรม. (2563, 4 มีนาคม). ข้อเสนอ BCG in Action: The New Sustainable Growth Enging: โมเดลเศรษฐกิจสู่การพัฒนาที่ยั่งยืน. สำนักงานพัฒนาวิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยีแห่งชาติ. https://www.nstda.or.th/home/knowledge_post/bcg-in-action-new-sustainable/
กรมโรงงานอุตสาหกรรม. (2565). คู่มืออุตสาหกรรมสีเขียว. กองส่งเสริมเทคโนโลยีสิ่งแวดล้อมโรงงาน.
กรมอุตุนิยมวิทยา. (2565, 15 ธันวาคม). ความผันแปรและการเปลี่ยนแปลงภูมิอากาศของประเทศไทยและการคาดการณ์ในอนาคต. https://www.tmd.go.th/media/PDF/climate_future.pdf
นิธิภักดิ์ กทิศาสตร์. (2561). การดำเนินงานด้านความรับผิดชอบต่อสังคมขององค์การเพื่อความยั่งยืน. วารสารวิชาการ คณะวิทยาการจัดการ มหาวิทยาลัยราชภัฏมหาสารคาม, 3(6), 55-62.
พรชนก ทองลาด ไพฑูรย์ อินต๊ะขัน และ บัณฑิต บุษบา. (2559). แนวทางการพัฒนาธุรกิจให้มีความยั่งยืนตามปรัชญาเศรษฐกิจพอ เพียงของธุรกิจขนาดกลางและขนาดย่อมในจังหวัดลำปาง ลำพูน และเชียงใหม่. วารสารสมาคมนักวิจัย. 21(1), 74-87.
เรวดี พานิช. (2563). เจตคติผู้บริหารบริษัทไทยที่มีต่อการดำเนินธุรกิจแบบยั่งยืนตามเป้าหมายการพัฒนาที่ยั่งยืนขององค์การสหประชาชาติ 2015-2030. วารสารวิชาการสมาคมสถาบันอุดมศึกษาเอกชนแห่งประเทศไทย. 26(2), 1-12.
สำนักงานเลขานุการของคณะกรรมการยุทธศาสตร์ชาติและสำนักงานคณะกรรมการพัฒนาการเศรษฐกิจและสังคมแห่งชาติ. (2561). ยุทธศาสตร์ชาติ พ.ศ. 2561 – 2580. สำนักงานคณะกรรมการพัฒนาการเศรษฐกิจและสังคมแห่งชาติ.
สฤณี อาชวานันทกุล. (2557, 22 มีนาคม). ธุรกิจที่ยั่งยืน. ยูทูป. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_ dKnNrqVCAs&list=LLl8yvydxYVIcET9vhPhXzPg&index=196
Aaker, D. A., Kumar, V., & Day, G. S. (2001). Marketing Research. John Wiley & Sons.
Albort-Morant, G., Leal, A., & Cepeda-Carrion, G. (2016). The antecedents of green innovation performance: A model of learning and capabilities. Journal of Business Research, 69(11), 4912-4917.
Abdullah, M., Zailani, S., Iranmanesh, M., & Jayaraman, K. (2016). Barriers to green innovation initiatives among manufacturers: the Malaysian case. Review of Managerial Science, 10(4), 683-709.
Altuntas, M., Berry-Stölzle, T. R., & Cummins, J. D. (2021). Enterprise risk management and economies of scale and scope: evidence from the German insurance industry. Annals of Operations Research, 299(1), 811-845.
Amabile, T. M. (1997). Motivating creativity in organizations: On doing what you love and loving
what you do. California Management Review, 40(1), 39-58.
Arun, K., & Özmutlu, S. (2021). Narratives of environmental munificence of 3PL firms on the relationship between dynamic capabilities, strategic management and organizational performance. Journal of Strategy and Management, 15(1), 96-118.
Breitenstein, M., Nguyen, D. K., & Walther, T. (2021). Environmental hazards and risk management in the fnancial sector: A systematic literature review. Journal of Economic Surveys, 35(2), 512–538.
Chen, P.-C., & Hung, S.-W. (2014). Collaborative green innovation in emerging countries: a social capital perspective. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 34(3), 347-363.
Chen, Y.-S., Lai, S.-B., & Wen, C.-T. (2006). The Influence of Green Innovation Performance on Corporate Advantage in Taiwan. Journal of Business Ethics, 67(4), 331-339.
Chu, Z., Wang, L., & Lai, F. (2019). Customer pressure and green innovations at third party logistics providers in China. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 30(1), 57-75.
Dangelico, R. M., Pujari, D., & Pontrandolfo, P. (2017). Green Product Innovation in Manufacturing Firms: A Sustainability-Oriented Dynamic Capability Perspective. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(4), 490-506.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate Data Analysis. Upper Saddle River. Pearson Prentice Hall.
Hart, S. L., & Dowell, G. (2011). Invited editorial: A natural-resource-based view of the firm: fifteen years after. Journal of Management, 37(5), 1464-1479.
Huang, J.-W., & Li, Y.-H. (2018). How resource alignment moderates the relationship between environmental innovation strategy and green innovation performance. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 33(3), 316-324.
Huang, Z., Liao, G., & Li, Z. (2019). Loaning scale and government subsidy for promoting green innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 144(1), 148-156.
Jin, C., Razzaq, A., Saleem, F., & Sinha, A. (2022). Asymmetric effects of eco-innovation and human capital development in realizing environmental sustainability in China: evidence from quantile ARDL framework. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 35(1), 4947–4970.
Karman, A., & Savaneviciene, A. (2021). Enhancing dynamic capabilities to improve sustainable competitiveness: insights from research on organisations of the Baltic region. Baltic journal of management. 16(2), 318-341.
Krejcie, R.V., & D.W. Morgan. (1970). Determining Sample Size for Research Activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 30(3), 607 – 610.
Lee, K., & Yoo, J. (2019). How does open innovation lead competitive advantage? A dynamic capability view perspective. PLOS ONE, 14(11), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0223405
Liu, C.-H., Chang, A. Y.-P., & Fang, Y.-P. (2020). Network activities as critical sources of creating capability and competitive advantage. Management Decision, 58(3), 544-568.
Memon, A., Yong An, Z., & Memon, M. Q. (2020). Does financial availability sustain financial, innovative, and environmental performance? Relation via opportunity recognition. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(2), 562-575.
Niewöhner, N., Asmar, L., Röltgen, D., Kühn, A., & Dumitrescu, R. (2020). The impact of the 4th industrial revolution on the design fields of innovation management. Procedia CIRP, 91(1), 43-48.
Park, S., Song, S., & Lee, S. (2017). How Do Investments in Human Resource Management Practices Affect Firm-Specific Risk in the Restaurant Industry? . Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 58(4), 374-386.
Rovinelli, R., & Hambleton, R. (1976). On the Use of Content Specialists in the Assessment of Criterion-Referenced Test Item Validity. Conference on the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association 19-23 April 1976, San Francisco, California. 1-37.
Santoro, G., Ferraris, A., Giacosa, E., & Giovando, G. (2018). How SMEs Engage in Open Innovation: a Survey. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 9(2), 561-574.
Sarfraz, M., Qun, W., Hui, L., & Abdullah, M. I. (2018). Environmental risk management strategies and the moderating role of corporate social responsibility in project financing Decisions. Sustainability, 10(8), 1-17.
Soewarno, N., Tjahjadi, B., & Fithrianti, F. (2019). Green innovation strategy and green innovation. Management Decision, 57(11), 3061-3078.
Song, W., & Yu, H. (2018). Green Innovation Strategy and Green Innovation: The Roles of Green Creativity and Green Organizational Identity. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25(2), 135-150.
Sun, Y., Bi, K., & Yin, S. (2020). Measuring and integrating risk management into green Innovation practices for green manufacturing under the global value chain. Sustainability, 12(2), 1-33.
Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319-1350.
Wang, C. H., & Juo, W.-J. (2021). An environmental policy of green intellectual capital: Green innovation strategy for performance sustainability. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(7), 3241-3254.
Wilhelm, H., Schlömer, M., & Maurer, I. (2015). How Dynamic Capabilities Affect the Effectiveness and Efficiency of Operating Routines under High and Low Levels of Environmental Dynamism. British Journal of Management, 26(2), 327-345.
Zhang, Y., Sun, J., Yang, Z., & Li, S. (2018). Organizational Learning and Green Innovation: Does Environmental Proactivity Matter? Sustainability, 10(10), 1-14.