Curriculum Integration Model Using King’s Science and Spatial Identity to Enhance Environmental Literacy for Students in Basic Education Level
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14456/rcmrj.2021.249549Keywords:
Curriculum integration, King’s science, Spatial identity, Environmental literacyAbstract
Today's environmental problems affect large number of population, which are mainly caused by human behaviors. The key mechanism for solving these problems is educational management to promote environmental literacy. This research aims to study the conditions and problems in promoting environmental literacy among students in basic education level and to design and evaluate the curriculum integration model using King’s science and spatial identity to enhance environmental literacy for the students. There are two phases of the research. Phase 1 is the study of the conditions and problems. The sample of the in-depth interview was 5 school administrators, and 5 teachers. Also, the sample for answering the questionnaire was 394 teachers. Phase 2 is the design and evaluation of curriculum integration models. The target group in the workshop were 10 teachers. Also, the population of evaluating curriculum integration model was 8 experts. Research instruments consisted of in-depth interview form, condition and problem questionnaire, workshop record form, and the model evaluation form. Data analysis was done by finding the means, standard deviations, and content analysis. The results of the research showed that 1) the condition of promoting environmental literacy in educational institutions was at a moderate level, presenting problems in enhancing environmental literacy at a high level, 2) a model of curriculum integration using King’s science and spatial identity to enhance environmental literacy has 7 components - principles of model, objectives of model, process of model, curriculum integration guidelines, measurement and evaluation, the role of the stakeholders, and success conditions, and 3) the results of the evaluation of the curriculum integration model were at a high level of propriety and feasibility.
References
Arends, R. I. (2016). Learning to Teach. (10th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Education.
Aumpi, S. (2015). Development of Environmental Literacy Scale for Lower Secondary Students. (M.Ed., Chulalongkorn University). (In Thai)
Benwell, B., & Stokoe, E. (2006). Spatial Identities. In Discourse and Identity (pp. 204-242). Edinburgh University Press.
Boonnen, W. (2015). Environmental Literacy, Awareness and Concepts of Global Warming Adaptation of Students at Demonstration School Mahasarakham University (Secondary Division). Bangkok: Health Fund and Global Warming Thailand Environment Institute. (In Thai)
Buosonte, R. (2019). Research and Development of Educational Innovation. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Press. (In Thai)
Choudhary, B. K. (2004). Formation and (Re) Formation of Spatial Identities under Globalization. Journal of Regional Development and Planning, 3(1), 35-48. https://econpapers.repec.org/article/risjrdpin/0024.htm
Creswell, J. W. (2015). A Concise Introduction to Mixed Methods Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Dechyotin, O., Singseevo, A., & Suksringam, P. (2017). The Development of Environmental Literacy of Mattayomsuksa 3 Students Using the Project-Based Teaching with Problem-Solving Thinking. Journal of Education Naresuan University, 19(2), 305-317. https://so06.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/edujournal_nu/article/view/89923 (In Thai)
Dick, W., Carey, L., & Carey, J. O. (2001). The Systematic Design of Instruction. New York: HarperCollins.
Erdogan, M., Kostova, Z., & Marcinkowski, T. (2009). Components of Environmental Literacy in Elementary Science Education Curriculum in Bulgaria and Turkey. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Sciences & Technology Education, 5(1), 15-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75253
Fadel, C. (2008). 21st Century Skills: How can you prepare students for the new Global Economy?. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/site/educeri21st/40756908.pdf
Graham, L., Berman, J., & Bellert, A. (2015). Sustainable Learning: Inclusive Practices for 21st Century Classroom. Port Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.
Hall, G. E., Quinn, L. F., & Gollnick, D. M. (2017). Introduction to Teaching: Making a Difference in Student Learning. Canada: SAGE Publication, Inc.
Jannah, M., Halim, L., Meerah, T. S. M., & Fairuz, M. (2013). Impact of Environmental Education Kit on Students’ Environmental Literacy. Asian Social Science, 9(12), 1-12. DOI: 10.5539/ass.v9n12p1
Kidman, G., & Casineder, N. (2019). Developing Teachers’ Environmental Literacy through Inquiry-Based Practices. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 15(6), 1-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/103065
Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining Sample Size for Research Activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30, 607-610. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447003000308
Nillapun, M., Phivitayasirithum, C., Vanichwatanavorachai, S., & Songserm, U. (2015). Evaluation of the Basic Education Core Curriculum 2008 in the Leading Schools for Curriculum Implementation. Silpakorn Educational Research Journal, 7(1), 26-41. https://so05.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/suedureasearchjournal/article/view/35831 (In Thai)
North American Association for Environmental Education. (2011). Developing a Framework for Assessing Environmental Literacy. Washington, D.C.: North American Association for Environmental Education.
Nopparak, S. (2018). King’s Science to Development Science of Administration. Bangkok: Amarin Printing & Publishing. (In Thai)
Office of the Education Council. (2020). Statement of Place-Based Learning in Thailand Context. Bangkok: Prikwankarnpim. (In Thai)
Office of the National Economic and Social Development Board. (2011). National Development Work Principles of His Majesty the King. Bangkok: Petchrung Printing Center. (In Thai)
Oliva, P. F., & Gordon II, W. R. (2013). Developing the Curriculum. (8th ed.). Singapore: Pearson Education South Asia Pte Ltd.
Ornstein, A. C., & Hunkins, F. P. (2018). Curriculum Foundations, Principles and Issues. (7th ed.). New Jersey: Englewood Cliffs.
Regional Education Office 15. (2020). Basic Information on Education in Government Inspectorate 15 of Academic Year 2020. Retrieved from http://www.reo15.moe.go.th/web/images/yutasan/kmps12563.pdf (In Thai)
Stevenson, K. T., Peterson, M. N., Bondell, H. D., Mertig, A. G., & Moore, S. E. (2013). Environmental, Institutional, and Demographic Predators of Environmental Literacy among Middle School Children. PLOS, 8(3), 1-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059519
Stobbelaar, D. J., & Pedroli, B. (2011). Perspectives on Landscape Identity: A Conceptual Challenge. Landscape Research, 36(3), 321–339. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01426397.2011.564860
Yue, T., Long, R., & Chen, H. (2013). Factors Influencing Energy-Saving Behavior of Urban Households in Jiangsu Province. Energy Policy, 62(2013), 665-675. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.07.051
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
1. Articles, information, content, images, etc. that are published in "Chiang Mai Rajabhat Research Journal" is the copyright of Chiang Mai Rajabhat Research Journal. Chiang Mai Rajabhat University. If any person or organization wants to distribute all or any part of it or do any action Must have written permission from the Chiang Mai Rajabhat Research Journal, Chiang Mai Rajabhat University.
2. Content of articles appearing in the journal is the responsibility of the author of the article. The journal editor is not required to agree or take any responsibility.
