THE LEADERSHIP OF ADMINISTRATOR AFFECTING SUCCESS OF WORLD CLASS STANDARD SCHOOL UNDER SECONDARY EDUCATIONAL SERVICE AREA OFFICE 7
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The purposes of this research were to study (1) the leadership level of administrators of world-class standard schools; (2) the success level of world-class standard schools; (3) the relationship between leadership of administrators and success of world class standard schools; and (4) the leadership of administrators affecting the success of world class standard schools under the Secondary Education Service Area Office 7. The research sample consisted of 285 administrators and teachers of world class standard schools, obtained by muiti-stage random sampling. The sample size was determined based on Krejcie and Morgan’s Sample Size Table. The tool for collecting data was a questionnaire. The employed statistics for data analysis were the frequency, percentage, mean, standard deviation, Pearson’s product moment correlation coefficient, and multiple regression analysis. The research results were as follows: (1) the overall rating mean of administrators’ leadership was at the high level; the specific aspects of their leadership could be ranked from top to bottom based on their rating means as follows: transformational leadership aspect, strategic leadership aspect, super leadership aspect, and global leadership aspect, respectively; (2) the overall rating mean of success of world class standard schools was at the high level, with the specific aspect of success receiving top rating mean being the cooperative development networks aspect, followed by the administration and management system aspect, the quality of school administrator aspect, and the advanced thinking aspect, respectively; (3) leadership of administrators correlated with the success of world class standard schools positively and at the high level (rxy = .741), which was significant at the .05 level; and (4) the school administrators’ leadership aspects of super leadership (X1), strategic leadership (X2), transformational leadership (X3), and global Leadership (X4) affected the success of world class standard schools; they could be combined to predict the success of world class standard schools by 60.40 percent; and the predictive equation could be written in form of raw scores as shown below: Y´ = .890 + .345 (X1) - .157 (X2) - .161 (X3) + .712 (X4)
Article Details
I and co-author(s) certify that articles of this proposal had not yet been published and is not in the process of publication in journals or other published sources. I and co-author accept the rules of the manuscript consideration. Both agree that the editors have the right to consider and make recommendations to the appropriate source. With this rights offering articles that have been published to Panyapiwat Institute of Management. If there is a claim of copyright infringement on the part of the text or graphics that appear in the article. I and co-author(s) agree on sole responsibility.
References
Best, J. W. & Kahn, J. V. (1993). Research in Education (7th ed.) Boston: Allyn Bacon.
Booncharoensuk, N. (2018). The Relationship between Strategic Leadership of Administrators and School Effectiveness in Chachoengsao Province under the Secondary Educational Service Area Office 6. Academic Journal Institute of Physical Education, 10(2), 274-291. [in Thai]
Cronbach, L. (1974). Essentials of Psychological Testing. New York: Harper and Row.
Innapa, T. (2011). Alternative: The Study of Globalization Leadership Affecting to an Effectiveness of Protection and Enforcement Undertaken by the Chumphon Provincial Police Station. Master’s Thesis, Phetchaburi Rajabhat University. [in Thai]
Jantakoon, K. (2017). The Relationship between Superleadership of School Administrators and School Effectiveness in Naruebodindrachinta Cluster Under the Secondary Educational Service Area Office 7. Master’s Thesis, Burapha University. [in Thai]
Khuangporn, K. (2015). Development of 21st Century Transformational Leadership Skill Scale for Undergraduate Students. Master’s Thesis, Chulalongkorn University. [in Thai]
Krejcie, R. V. & Morgan D. W. (1970). Determining Sample Size for Research Activities. Education and Psychology Measurement, 30(3), 607-610.
Lamsan, N. (2015). Leadership and Administrative Competencies Affecting the Excellence of School. Suan Sunandha Rajabhat University Graduate Studies Journal, 8(2), 136-149. [in Thai]
Matthayomnan, P., Songbundit, A., & Srisir, S. (2018). Transformational Leadership Elements as a Predictor of Success Among World-class Standard Schools Under the Secondary Educational Service, Area Office 1. SWU Educational Administration Journal, 15(9), 21-31. [in Thai]
Mimun, W. & Wangthanomsak, M. (2016). The Success of World-class Standard School. Journal of Education, Silpakorn University, 6(2), 112-121. [in Thai]
Namnai, S. (2010). The Relationship Between School Administrators Leadership and High Efficient Organization of the World-class Standard Schools. Master’s Thesis, Dhonburi Rajabhat University. [in Thai]
Promnil, W. (2017). The Management Factors Affecting Success of School in World Class Standard School Project Under the Control of Pathum Thani Provincial Educational Office. Master’s Thesis, Rajamangala University of Technology Thanyaburi. [in Thai]
Office of Secondary Education. (2010). Manual of Strategy Driving World-class Standard School. Bangkok: The Agricultural Cooperative Federation of Thailand. [in Thai]
Office of Secondary Education. (2018). Goal and Indicator of Students World-class Standard School 2018. Bangkok: The Agricultural Cooperative Federation of Thailand. [in Thai]
Poochareon, S. (2017). Leadership of Executive. Retrieved April 30, 2020, from http://www.kruinter.com/ [in Thai]
Sidtikeaw, K. (2015). Administrator’s Strategic Leadership in the 21st Century Affecting the Internal Quality Assurance/Implementation of School under Pathum Thani Primary Education Service Area Office. Master’s Thesis, Rajamangala University of Technology. [in Thai]
Srisa-ard, B. & Nilkaew, B. (2002). Population of Inference When Using Rating Scale with Sample. Journal of Educational Measurement Mahasarakham University, 3(1), 22-25. [in Thai]
Tawilakan, D. (2015). “Superleadership” Leadership in 21st Century. Journal of Educational Administration Khon Kaen University, 11(2), 23-35. [in Thai]
Timothy A. J., Ronald F. P., & Remus, I. (2004). The Forgotten Ones? The Validity of Consideration and Initiating Structurein Leadership Research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 9(1), 36-51.
Yaenwong, J. (2017). Leadership Development Strategies for Secondary School Administrator According to the Concept of Global Leadership Development in Students. Doctoral Dissertation, Chulalongkorn University. [in Thai]
Yimrod, Y. & Suksodkiew, V. (2017). Strategic Leadership and the Quality of Student in Worldclass Standard Secondary School Under the Provincial Education Office in the West Region. Journal of Education, Silpakorn University, 8(1), 176-186. [in Thai]
Yoorod, C. (2014). Relationship Between Transformational Leadership of Administrators and World Class Standard School Effectiveness Under the Office of Chanthaburi Primary Educational Service Area Office 1. Master’s Thesis, Burapha University. [in Thai]