THE FOUR PRACTICE GUIDELINES OF TEACHING AND LEARNING IN HIGHER EDUCATION ACCORDING TO THE PHILOSOPHY OF SUFFICIENCY ECONOMY FOR HIGHER EDUCATION 4.0 DEVELOPMENT
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article explains the importance and four practice guidelines of how to apply the philosophy of sufficiency economy for instructional management in higher education toward development of higher education 4.0. The four guidelines include the adjustment of course syllabus and details of contents; adjustment of instructional activities; adjustment of the uses of instructional media, sources of learning, etc.; and adjustment of educational measurement and evaluation. All of these are for the benefits of developing the potentials of instructors and students in higher education institutions so that they can create educational innovations and basis of competencies for the security, prosperity, and sustainability of the well-being of their own living, their families, society, and nation.
Article Details
I and co-author(s) certify that articles of this proposal had not yet been published and is not in the process of publication in journals or other published sources. I and co-author accept the rules of the manuscript consideration. Both agree that the editors have the right to consider and make recommendations to the appropriate source. With this rights offering articles that have been published to Panyapiwat Institute of Management. If there is a claim of copyright infringement on the part of the text or graphics that appear in the article. I and co-author(s) agree on sole responsibility.
References
American Library Association. (2007). Information Literacy Competency Standards for Higher Education. Retrieved August 30, 2016, from http://www.ala.org/ala/acrl/acrlstandards/
Mascharat, T. (2007). Learning Management Model According to the King’s Philosophy of Sufficiency Economy. Bangkok: Tharnaksorn Publishing Co., Ltd. [in Thai]
Moate, R. M. & Cox, J. A. (2015). Learner-centered Pedagogy Consideration for Application in a Didactic Course. The Professional Counselor, 5(3), 379-389. http://doi.org/10.15241/mm.5.3.379
Phiboonsarawut, P. (2007). The Drive of Sufficiency Economy in Education. Bangkok: The Research Project of Sufficiency Economy, Crown Property Bureau. [in Thai]
Puttakosa, K. (2011). Handbook of Learning Community Development. Bangkok: National Research Council of Thailand. [in Thai]
Ritcharoon, P. (2012). Principles of Educational Measurement and Evaluation (7thed.). Bangkok: House of Kermit Co., Ltd. [in Thai]
Saengprateepthong, W. (2013). Measurement and Evaluation. Nontaburi: College of Education, Sukhothaithammathirat University. [in Thai]
Sathboonshang, S. (2007). Seven Steps of Practice to the Way of Sufficiency Economy (2nd ed.). Bangkok: SE-ED Ucation. [in Thai]
The Office of the Education Council. (2019). National Educational Standards 2018. Bangkok: 21st Century. [in Thai]
Wiboonsri, Y. R. (2011). Measurement and Test Design for Achievement (10th ed.). Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Press. [in Thai]