The analysis of Chinese local curriculum upper secondary level for the southern institution region
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Curriculum is the important factor for education management, as it involves in the plan to upgrade the education standard systematically and can be the guide line for learners to meet their destination. The objectives of this research article are 1) to analyze the good point and week point of the local institution curriculum in the southern region, and 2) to be the guideline to improve the southern curriculum in the future.
The research result revealed that the southern curriculum designed for the upper secondary level has compiled systematically and properly in accordance with the curriculum structure. Various activities are designed to enhance the teaching - learning is the outstanding point of this curriculum. The weak points of this curriculum are, all schools in this region in the upper and lower part of the south still not involved in this curriculum compilers. More than that this curriculum should extend to the lower secondary and primary level to reduce the discontinuance of the study, give up the overlap learning content, such as Chinese used to begin at the starting point in every level. This southern curriculum can be adapted to the other education commissions widely to strengthen Chinese in the southern region.
Article Details
The content and information published in the Phuket Rajabhat University Academic Journal represent the opinions and sole responsibility of the authors. The editorial board does not necessarily endorse or share any responsibility for these view.
Articles, data, content, images, etc., published in the Phuket Rajabhat University Academic Journal are the copyright of the Phuket Rajabhat University Academic Journal. Any individual or organization wishing to reproduce or utilize all or part of this material for any purpose must obtain prior written permission from the Phuket Rajabhat University Academic Journal.
References
Academic Affairs and Educational Standards Bureau, Office of Basic Education Commission, Ministry of Education. (2013). Indicators and Chinese language learning strands following the basic education core curriculum 2008 in learning area of foreign languages. Bangkok: Office of the Welfare Promotion Commission for Teachers and Educational Personnel Printing House.
Boonsong, K. (2008). Curriculum development and teaching development [Mimeograph]. Phetchaburi: Faculty of Education, Phetchaburi Rajabhat University.
Brady, L. (1995). Curriculum development, 5th edn. Sydney: Prentice-Hall.
Bua-Sri, T. (1999). Curriculum theories: design and development. Bangkok: Tanathach Printing House.
Kaewbut, P. & Nitnara A. (2016). The current situation and development guidelines of the Chinese instruction in public schools. In J. Sanchai (Ed.), Proceeding of the 8th National Academic Conference: “Research and Innovation for Globalization” (pp. 70). Phuket: Phuket Rajabhat University.
Kaewbut, P. (2020). Research report for a study of guideline of high school Chinese curriculum construction in southern Thailand. Surat Thani: Prince of Songkla University.
Kaewbut, P. (2019). Language policy to distribute Chinese and culture via HSK test. Phranakhon Rajabhat Research Journal (Humanities and Social Sciences). 14(2), 307 - 325.
Kaewbut, P. (2020). Students' attention to the additional activities outside the Chinese class: case study of students that study Chinese Prince of Songkla University, Surat Thani Campus. Srinakharinwirot Research and Development (Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences). 12(23), 27 - 38.
Ministry of Education. (2008). The basic education core curriculum 2008. Bangkok: Printing Cooperative of Thailand.
Srisa-ard, B. (2003). The development of the curriculum and curriculum research. Bangkok: Suveeriyasart Press.
Taba, H. (1962). Curriculum development: theory and practice. New York: Harcourt Brace.
