Exploratory factor analysis of new technology acceptance

Authors

  • Vutti Watcharodomprasert Faculty of Business Administration, Thonburi University

Keywords:

New Technology Acceptance, Readiness and Support for New Technology Adoption, Efficiency and Utilization of New Technology, Complexity of New Technology

Abstract

This research examines the acceptance of new technologies, referring to the level of willingness of users to adopt emerging technologies such as Artificial Intelligence, Blockchain, the Internet of Things, Virtual and Augmented Reality, Quantum Computing, and others in their work. The belief is that utilizing such technologies will enhance work efficiency. The objectives of the study are: 1. To explore the components of factors influencing the acceptance of new technologies, and 2. To analyze these components and develop a model for new technology acceptance in the Bangkok area. This research follows a quantitative approach. The sample consists of 385 technology users, including students and working professionals in Bangkok, selected through simple random sampling. The research instrument used was a questionnaire, and the statistical analyses included frequency, mean, standard deviation, and exploratory factor analysis (EFA). The study's findings reveal that the exploratory factor analysis of new technology acceptance can be divided into three dimensions. The first dimension, Readiness and Support for New Technology Adoption, consists of four factors: 1) Trust in Leadership, 2) Training, 3) Involvement in Decision-Making, and 4) Technological Readiness. The second dimension, Efficiency and Utilization of New Technology, includes five factors: 1) Perceived Usefulness, 2) Perceived Ease of Use, 3) Attitude Toward Using, 4) Relative Advantage, and 5) Observability. The third dimension, Complexity of New Technology, is represented by a single factor: Complexity.

References

ธานินทร์ ศิลป์จารุ. (2555). การวิจัยและการวิเคราะห์ข้อมูลทางสถิติด้วย SPSS และ AMOS. สามัญบิสซิเนสอาร์ แอนด์ดี.

Bartlett, M. S. (1950). Tests of significance in factor analysis. British Journal of Psychology, 3(2), 77–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8317.1950.tb00285.x

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.

Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S., & Sowa, D. (1986). Perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(3), 500-507. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.71.3.500

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Pearson Prentice Hall.

Hiatt, J. M. (2006). ADKAR: A model for change in business, government, and our community. Prosci Research.

Kaiser, H. F. (1970). A second generation little jiffy. Psychometrika, 35(4), 401–415. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291817

Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). Free Press.

Russell, S. J., & Norvig, P. (2021). Artificial intelligence: A modern approach (4th ed.). Pearson.

Thurstone, L. L. (1931). Multiple factor analysis. Psychological Review, 38(5), 406-427. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/h0069792

Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540

West, S. G., Finch, J. F., & Curran, P. J. (1995). Structural equation models with nonnormal variables: Problems and remedies. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 56-75). Sage.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-13

How to Cite

Watcharodomprasert, V. (2024). Exploratory factor analysis of new technology acceptance. SUTHIPARITHAT JOURNAL, 38(4), 55–70. retrieved from https://so05.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/DPUSuthiparithatJournal/article/view/275292