Exploratory factor analysis of new technology acceptance
Keywords:
New Technology Acceptance, Readiness and Support for New Technology Adoption, Efficiency and Utilization of New Technology, Complexity of New TechnologyAbstract
This research examines the acceptance of new technologies, referring to the level of willingness of users to adopt emerging technologies such as Artificial Intelligence, Blockchain, the Internet of Things, Virtual and Augmented Reality, Quantum Computing, and others in their work. The belief is that utilizing such technologies will enhance work efficiency. The objectives of the study are: 1. To explore the components of factors influencing the acceptance of new technologies, and 2. To analyze these components and develop a model for new technology acceptance in the Bangkok area. This research follows a quantitative approach. The sample consists of 385 technology users, including students and working professionals in Bangkok, selected through simple random sampling. The research instrument used was a questionnaire, and the statistical analyses included frequency, mean, standard deviation, and exploratory factor analysis (EFA). The study's findings reveal that the exploratory factor analysis of new technology acceptance can be divided into three dimensions. The first dimension, Readiness and Support for New Technology Adoption, consists of four factors: 1) Trust in Leadership, 2) Training, 3) Involvement in Decision-Making, and 4) Technological Readiness. The second dimension, Efficiency and Utilization of New Technology, includes five factors: 1) Perceived Usefulness, 2) Perceived Ease of Use, 3) Attitude Toward Using, 4) Relative Advantage, and 5) Observability. The third dimension, Complexity of New Technology, is represented by a single factor: Complexity.
References
ธานินทร์ ศิลป์จารุ. (2555). การวิจัยและการวิเคราะห์ข้อมูลทางสถิติด้วย SPSS และ AMOS. สามัญบิสซิเนสอาร์ แอนด์ดี.
Bartlett, M. S. (1950). Tests of significance in factor analysis. British Journal of Psychology, 3(2), 77–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8317.1950.tb00285.x
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.
Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S., & Sowa, D. (1986). Perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(3), 500-507. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.71.3.500
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Pearson Prentice Hall.
Hiatt, J. M. (2006). ADKAR: A model for change in business, government, and our community. Prosci Research.
Kaiser, H. F. (1970). A second generation little jiffy. Psychometrika, 35(4), 401–415. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291817
Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). Free Press.
Russell, S. J., & Norvig, P. (2021). Artificial intelligence: A modern approach (4th ed.). Pearson.
Thurstone, L. L. (1931). Multiple factor analysis. Psychological Review, 38(5), 406-427. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/h0069792
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
West, S. G., Finch, J. F., & Curran, P. J. (1995). Structural equation models with nonnormal variables: Problems and remedies. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 56-75). Sage.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Dhurakij Pundit University

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Content and information of the article published at Suthiparithat Journal are based on the sole opinions and responsibility of author(s) only. Neither the editorial board involve in......
