Development of Homosexual People through the change of Western Context History

Authors

  • ณปรัชญ์ บุญวาศ คณะมนุษยศาสตร์และสังคมศาสตร์ มหาวิทยาลัยสงขลานครินทร์

Keywords:

Homosexuality, Western History, Christianity, Social Movement

Abstract

          The research entitled “Development of Homosexuality through the change of Western Context History” aimed at the investigation into how the evolution of “discourse,” social and cultural context, shapes perspectives of the European on homosexuals throughout the history.  The study concluded that the “shape” of homosexual identity in western societies was divided into 4 periods.

During Greco-Roman (to Christianization) period, a homosexual was viewed as stratification connecting to power and social network in which age and hierarchy were involved.  For instance, slaves and the younger were passive while bosses and the older played an active role.  Gender category was not existent at this time.  People were not defined if they were “straight”, “homosexual”, or “bisexual”.  A “pansexual” man was considered a real macho. “Pederasty,” the relationship between an adult male and a teenage lad, was popular in the Greek period. 

                   In the second period after Christianization in Roman Empire, homosexual relationship was viewed as a sin in accordance with the Jewish cultures taken by    Christianity, which was previously respected by the lower classes, whose culture was      against homosexuality.  In the earlier period of Greco-Roman, pederasty culture  prevailed among the elite who for the Christians were extravagant and immersed   themselves in lustful mood.   The Roman government, therefore, systematically regulated          laws against homosexuality, especially after the Reign of Emperor Justinian I of Byzantine           Empire and the Founder of Monastery St. Basil of Nyssa, mentioning that a man found   having sexual intercourse with a boy was not accepted in any holistic Christian ceremonies          even after death. 

                   Homosexuality in the third period was influenced by scientific revolution, especially the medical revolution when homosexuals were perceived as ‘the sick’ who     needed remedy.  However, it was the age when homosexuals started to have their own space called “Molly House,” which was the gay meeting place in London.  Homosexual culture reached its climax in Germany when Magnas Hadfield published “Der Elgine” magazine, which stated that homosexuality was “deep intrinsic instinct.”  After the World        War I, “sexology” institute was first established in 1919.  However, their dreams           collapsed with the rise of Nazi, who had harsh policy against homosexuality.  A lot of     German gays were arrested and put into concentration camp.

                   In the fourth period after the World War II, there were various civil societies on homosexuality such as COC movement in Netherland.  The strongest one was MattacinemovementIn America.  However, what dramatically increased the progression of homosexual movement was “Stonewall Riot,” in which the policemen raided Gay Club in   New York.  This provoked outrage among the gay communityand caused the riot against the police officers.  An important influence of this riot was the occurrence of gay pride          which started in Los Angeles and Chicago and spread to other countries including Canada, Australia and Western Europe.  In the 80 decade, a number of sports, music and films involving homosexuality arose.  This pushed Denmark ahead to successfully impose same-       sex marriage law the first time in the world in 1989.  

References

ภาษาไทย
กฤตินา อาชวนิจกุล และ วรรณา ทองสีมา(2550)“ผู้หญิง” ในวาทกรรมสิทธิ์ทางเพศ.
กรุงเทพฯ: สำนักพิมพ์อมรินทร์พรินติ้งแอนด์พับลิซซิ่ง จำกัด.
กาญจนา แก้วเทพและพริศราแซ่ก๊ว (2547). เพศวิถี: วันวาน วันนี้และวันพรุ่งที่จะไม่
เหมือนเดิม. กรุงเทพฯ: สำนักพิมพ์อมรินทร์พรินติ้งแอนด์พับลิซซิ่ง จำกัด.
เทอดศักดิ์ ร่มจำปา(2545)วาทกรรมเกี่ยวกับ “เกย์”ในสังคมไทย พ.ศ. 2508-2542.
วิทยานิพนธ์ สาขาประวัติศาสตร์ จุฬาลงกรณ์มหาวิทยาลัย. เอกสารอัดสำเนา.
อมรา พงศาพิชญ์ (2548) เพศสถานะและเพศวิถีในสังคมไทย. กรุงเทพฯ: จุฬาลงกรณ์
มหาวิทยาลัย.

English
Abelove, Henry.,Barale, Michele Aina (1993)The Lesbian and Gay Studies Reader. New
York: Routledge.
Altman, Dennis. c1971. Homosexual: Oppression and Liberation. New York: New York
University Press.
Bailey, Derrick Sheridan.1955. Homosexuality and the Christian Tradition.London:
Lingmans, Green.
Barry D., Adam. 1987. The Rise of Gay and Lesbian Movement. Boston: Twayne
Publisher.
Betteridge, Thomas. 2002. Sodomy in Early Modern Europe. Manchester: Manchester
University Press.
Boswell, John. 1986. Christianity, Social Tolerance and Homosexuality. Chicago:
University of Chicago Press.
Cantarella, Eva. 1992. Bisexuality in the Ancient World. New Haven: Yale University
Press.
Cortese, Daniel K. 2006. Are We Thinking Straight: the Politics of Straightness in a Lesbian and Gay Social Movement Organization.Rouledge: New York.
De cecco, John P., Elia John P. c1993. If You seduce a Straight Person, can You make
them Gay? ; Issues in Biological essentialism versus Social Constructionism in
Gay and Lesbian Identities.New York Haworth Press.
En.wikipedia.org/wiki/same_sex_marriage
Foucault, Michel. 1990. History of Sexuality Vol.1 An Introduction .Trans. By Robert
Hurley. New York: Vintage Book.
Galloway, Bruce. 1983. Prejudice and Pride; discrimination Against Gay People in
Modern Britain. London: Routledge&Kegay Paul.
Gay Left Collective. 1980. Homosexual: Power&Politics. London: Allison and Busby.
Goss, Robert E. 1997. Our Family Our Values.New York: the Harrington Park Press.
Grosz, Elizabeth A. Probyn, Elspeth (ed.) 1995. Sexual Bodies: the Strange Calamities of
Feminism.London: Roultedge.
Harris, Deniel. 1997. The Rise and Fall of Gay Cultural. New York: Ballantine Books.
Hunter, Ski (ed.). Lesbian, Gay and Bisexual Youths and Adults: Knowledge for Human Services Practice. SAGE Publications: London.
Hart, John., Richardson, Diane. 1981. The Theory and Practice of Homosexuality. London:
Routledge&Kegan Paul.
Herdt, Gilbert. 1990. Third Sex, Third Gender: Beyond Sexual Dimorphism in Culture and
History.Zone Books: New York.
Huwley, John C. 2001. Postcolonial Queer: theoretical Intersections. State University of
New York Press: Albany.
Jenning, Kevin. 1994. Becoming Visible. Los Angeles: Alyson Publication.
Kirsch, Max H. 2000.Queer Theory and Social Change. Routledge: London
Marrnor, Judd. 1965. Sexual Inversion; the Multiple Roots of Homosexuality. New York: Basic
Books.
McCaaffrey, Joseph Anthony., Harting, Suzanne M. (ed.) 1972. The Homosexual Dialectic.
Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
Paludi, Doyle. 1998. Sex& Gender: the Human Experience. 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill: Boston.
Pounds N.J.G. 1994.The Culture of the English People. Great Britain University Press:
Cambridge.
Plummer, Kenneth.1981.The Making of Modern Homosexual. London: Hutchinson.
Rictor, Norton. 1997. The Myth of Modern Homosexual: Queer History and Search for
Cultural Unity.London: Cassell.
Rose, Kleran. 1994. Diverse communities: the Evolution of Lesbian and gay Politics in
Ireland. Cork, Ireland: Cork University Press.
Seabrook, Jeremy. 1976. A Lasting Relationship: Homosexual and Society. London: Allen
Lane.
Spenser, Collin. 1996. Homosexuality : a History. London: Fourth Estate.
Sandfort, theo. 2000. Lesbian and Gay Studies.: an Introductionary, Interdisciplinary
Approach. London: Sage.
Weeks, Jeffrey, Holland, Janet (ed.). 1996. Sexual Cultural: Communities, Values, and
Intimacy. New York: Macmillan.
Wilkinson, James and Hughes, H. Stuart.1995.Contemporary Europe: A History. 8thed.
Prentice Hall: New Jersey.
Wilson, Paul. 1971. The Sexual of Dilemma: Abortion, Homosexuality, Prostitution and
Criminal Threshold. University of Queensland Press: Queensland.
Wood, Julia T. 1999. Gendered Lives: Communication, Gender and Culture. Third ed.
Wadsworth Publishing Company: Albany NY.

Downloads

Published

2021-12-03

How to Cite

บุญวาศ ณ. (2021). Development of Homosexual People through the change of Western Context History . SAU Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 5(2), 133–149. retrieved from https://so05.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/saujournalssh/article/view/252482