Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG): Concepts and lessons from research on firm value

Authors

  • Athipat Saisoong Faculty of Business Administration and Liberal Arts, Rajamangala University of Technology Lanna
  • Chutisorn Ruangnarab Faculty of Business Administration and Liberal Arts, Rajamangala University of Technology Lanna
  • Aranphong Thananchai Faculty of Business Administration and Liberal Arts, Rajamangala University of Technology Lanna

Keywords:

Environmental, Social, Governance, Conceptual Framework, Firm Valuation

Abstract

The concept of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) is gaining significant attention in both business organizations and academia due to its crucial role in sustainable business operations and its impact on decision-making. Numerous studies have examined the effects of ESG on financial performance, risk management, and firm value. Awareness of the impacts of environmental issues, social changes, and the demand for transparency directly influences investors and stakeholders. The findings from these studies remain diverse, with some supporting that ESG enhances firm value by reducing capital costs and boosting competitive ability, while others suggest that ESG may impose a cost burden that negatively affects financial performance.

This article aims to review the literature on ESG by synthesizing related concepts and theories, while analyzing the impacts of ESG as a key variable. A structured literature review was conducted, selecting articles from reliable databases and using comparative analysis to highlight the differing impacts depending on ESG integration and organizational strategies. It was found that the effects of ESG may vary depending on environmental factors such as industry characteristics, regulations, and the level of ESG disclosure. Although the research findings show both supportive and conflicting views, it is clear that ESG plays an important role in firm value in one way or another. Thus, this article provides a key direction for future studies to enhance understanding in the future.

References

ดารารัตน์ โพธิ์ประจักษ์, ชนาเมธ น้อยอ่าง, และอุภาวดี เนื่องวรรณะ. (2566). การสังเคราะห์โมเดลสมการโครงสร้างการเปิดเผยข้อมูลการพัฒนาที่ยั่งยืนที่ส่งผลต่อมูลค่ากิจการผ่านความเข้มแข็งทางการเงินของบริษัทที่จดทะเบียนในตลาดหลักทรัพย์แห่งประเทศไทย กลุ่มเกษตรและอุตสาหกรรมอาหาร กลุ่มบริการ และกลุ่มสินค้าอุปโภคบริโภค ภายใต้วิกฤตการณ์การแพร่ระบาดของเชื้อไวรัสโคโรนา 2019. วารสารนวัตกรรมธุรกิจ การจัดการ และสังคมศาสตร์, 4(1), 42-59. https://so03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jibim/article/view/267433

ธกานต์ ชาติวงค์. (2560). ทฤษฎีที่ใช้อธิบายงานวิจัยทางบัญชี: จากอดีตถึงอนาคต. วารสารวิชาการบริหารธุรกิจ สมาคมสถาบันอุดมศึกษาเอกชนแห่งประเทศไทย ในพระบรมราชูปถัมภ์ สมเด็จพระเทพรัตนราชสุดาฯ สยามบรมราชกุมารี, 6(2), 203-212. https://so02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/apheitvu/article/view/111339

พรรณทิพย์ อย่างกลั่น และฐิตาภรณ์ สินจรูญศักดิ์. (2564). อิทธิพลของการรายงานตามความรับผิดชอบต่อสังคม และการจัดการกำไรที่ส่งผลต่อมูลค่ากิจการของบริษัทจดทะเบียนในตลาดหลักทรัพย์แห่งประเทศไทย. วารสารสังคมศาสตร์และมานุษยวิทยาเชิงพุทธ, 6(12), 318-329. https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/JSBA/article/view/252517

สถาบันไทยพัฒน์. (2565). 6 ทิศทาง CSR ปี 2565. https://thaipat.sharefile.com/share/view/sf1355b6db9cf44ea83f0fc32b9d3c7e6

สมาคมบริษัทหลักทรัพย์ไทย. (ม.ป.ป.). ESG ปัจจัยสำคัญสู่แนวทางการประกอบธุรกิจตามหลักความยั่งยืน. ผู้แต่ง. https://www.asco.or.th/uploads/upfiles/files/ASCO%20article_ESG_ed.pdf

Aragon-Correa, J. A., & Sharma, S. (2003). A contingent resource-based view of proactive corporate environmental strategy. Academy of Management Review, 28(1), 71–88. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2003.8925233

Arnold, G., & Davies M. (2000). Value-based management: Context and application. Wiley.

Bahadır, O., & Akarsu, S. (2024). Does company information environment affect ESG–financial performance relationship? Evidence from European Markets. Sustainability, 16(7), Article 2701. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16072701

Bloomberg. (2024). Bloomberg for education: The environmental, social, and governance course. https://www.bloomberg.com/professional/products/bloomberg-terminal/education/certificate-courses/

Carbon Disclosure Project. (2024). Key changes for 2024: Part I corporate disclosure. Author.

Chairani, C., & Siregar, S. V. (2021a). The effect of enterprise risk management on financial performance and firm value: The role of environmental, social and governance performance. Meditari Accountancy Research, 29(3), 647-670. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-09-2019-0549

Chairani, C., & Siregar, S. V. (2021b). Disclosure of enterprise risk management in ASEAN 5: Sustainable development for green economy. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 716, Article 012101. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/716/1/012101

Copeland, T., & Dolgoff, A. (2005). Outperform with expectations-based management: A state-of-the-art approach to creating and enhancing shareholder value. Wiley.

Cui, J. (2025). Entrepreneurial motivations and ESG performance evidence from automobile companies Listed on the Chinese Stock Exchange. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2503.21828

Delvina, E. M., & Hidayah, R. (2023). The effect of ESG (environmental, social and governance) performance on company value and company performance. Management Studies and Entrepreneurship Journal (MSEJ), 4(5), 5436-5444. https://journal.yrpipku.com/index.php/msej/article/view/2903

DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101

ESG risk ratings methodology. (n.d.). Sustainalytics. https://connect.sustainalytics.com/esg-risk-ratings-methodology

ESG scores and raw data. (n.d.). S&P Global ESG Solutions. https://www.spglobal.com/esg/solutions/esg-scores-data

Fernandes, C. G., de Freitas Luna, M. S., Junior, E. M., & Maria, M. M. L. (2024). The impact of controversial ESG on the market value and financial constraints of brics companies. Revista De Gestão Social E Ambiental, 18(4), Article e04679. https://doi.org/10.24857/rgsa.v18n4-042

Fernando, J. (2022, September 29). Gross Domestic Product (GDP). Investopedia. https://www.investopedia.com/terms/g/gdp.asp

Freeman, R. E., & McVea, J. (2001). A stakeholder approach to strategic management. In M. A. Hitt, R. E. Freeman, & J. S. Harrison (Eds.), The blackwell handbook of strategic management (pp. 189–207). Blackwell Publishing.

Freeman, R. E., & Reed, D. L. (1983). Stockholders and stakeholders: A new perspective on corporate governance. California Management Review, 25(3), 88–106. https://doi.org/10.2307/41165018

Friede, G., Busch, T., & Bassen, A. (2015). ESG and financial performance: Aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 5(4), 210–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2015.1118917

Fuadah, L. L., Mukhtaruddin, M., Andriana, I., & Arisman, A. (2022). The ownership structure, and the Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) disclosure, firm value and firm performance: The audit committee as moderating variable. Economies, 10(12), Article 314. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies10120314

Haspeslagh, P. C., Noda, T., & Boulos, F. (2001). Managing for value: It's not just about the numbers. Harvard Business Review, 79(7), 64–73.

Hikmah, N., & Daljono, D. (2023). The impact of ESG disclosure, liquidity, and leverage on firm value mediated by profitability performance. Kontigensi: Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen, 11(2), 817-831. https://doi.org/10.56457/jimk.v11i2.504

Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X

Karina, R., Lestari, F., & Ivone, I. (2023). The effect of enterprise risk management on financial performance and firm value: The role of environmental, social and governance performance. Global Financial Accounting Journal, 7(2), 213-229. https://doi.org/10.37253/gfa.v7i2.8706

KnowESG. (2023, February 14). Comparing ESG ratings agencies: MSCI, Morningstar, Bloomberg, LSEG and more. https://www.knowesg.com/featured-article/esg-ratings-a-benchmark-for-performance

Kwintana, E., & Hanggraeni, D. (2023). The influence of Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) on profitability, cost of debt, and company value: The role of moderation of Environmental, Social, Governance (ESG) In Asean-5 countries period 2017-2021. International Journal of Economics Development Research (IJEDR), 4(2), 830-845. https://journal.yrpipku.com/index.php/ijedr/article/view/2823

Lublóy, Á., Keresztúri, J. L., & Berlinger, E. (2025). Quantifying firm-level greenwashing: A systematic literature review. Journal of Environmental Management, 373, Article 123399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123399

Orsagh, M., Allen, J., Sloggett, J., Georgieva, A., Bartholdy, S., & Douma, K. (2018). Guidance and case studies for ESG integration: Equities and fixed income. CFA Institute. https://www.cfainstitute.org/sites/default/files/-/media/documents/survey/guidance-case-studies-esg-integration.pdf

Perdana, M., Salim, U., Ratna, K., & Rofiq, A. (2023, July). The effect of Environmental Social Governance (ESG) performance and financial performance on firm value: Evidence from the banking sector in ASEAN. In 1st Brawijaya International Conference on Business and Law (BICoBL 2022) (pp. 183-193). Atlantis Press.

Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3088148

Terdpaopong, K., Wegmann, G., Kraiwanit, T., Limna, P., & Rafiyya, A. (2024). Unveiling the influence of ESG disclosures on corporate profitability: Insights from Thailand’s publicly listed companies. Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development, 8(7), Article 4787. https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v8i7.4787

The Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures. (2022). The Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) checklist: The securities and exchange commission capacity building workshop. ASEAN Low Carbon Energy Programme. https://www.sec.or.th/TH/Documents/Seminars/OneReport-webinarII-02.pdf

World Economic Forum. (2023). Global risks report 2023. Author.

Yang, Z., Nguyen, T. T. H., Nguyen, H. N., Nguyen, T. T. N., & Cao, T. T. (2020). Greenwashing behaviours: Causes, taxonomy and consequences based on a systematic literature review. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 21(5), 1486–1507. https://doi.org/10.3846/jbem.2020.13225

Zhang, F., Qin, X., & Liu, L. (2020). The interaction effect between ESG and green innovation and its impact on firm value from the perspective of information disclosure. Sustainability, 12(5), Article 1866. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12051866

Downloads

Published

2025-08-18

How to Cite

Saisoong, A., Ruangnarab, C., & Thananchai, A. (2025). Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG): Concepts and lessons from research on firm value. SUTHIPARITHAT JOURNAL, 39(3), 30–51. retrieved from https://so05.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/DPUSuthiparithatJournal/article/view/279707