THE FACTOR ANALYSIS OF STUDENT COMPANIONATE LOVE
Keywords:
Companionate love, A factor analysis of student companionate loveAbstract
The purposes of this research were to analyze the factors of companionate love and levels of student companionate love. The population were 50,373 students who studying of secondary education area in Bangkok of academic year 2011. The samples were 1400 students who studying in grade 2 of,sampling by multistage random sampling method. The research instruments was 60 items of companionate love test with .95 reliability coefficient (alpha). Statistics method with mean and Standard Deviation. were used to analyze the data.
The results of the study were as follows : 1. Both exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis supported and confirmed that companionate love consisted of the three structural factors with thirteen componential indexes: the first the factor of sensory perceptions of cognition; remind, value, positive thinking and acceptance. the second was the factor of sensory perceptions of feeling; attachment, care, trust, empathy and happiness. the third was the factor of sensory perceptions of behavior; sacrifice, helping, consultant and intimate communication. These three factors were suitable to the empirical data of high loading at the .05 statistic significant level and could be used as the instrument to measure the companionate love functioning factors. 2. The companionate love were considering that the scores of sensory perceptions of cognition factor and behavior factor were in hight level but sensory perceptions of feeling factor score was in medium level.
References
ลลนา ปิยะอารีธรรม. (2552). การศึกษาความว้าเหว่และสัมพันธภาพกับเพื่อนของนักเรียนช่วงชั้นที่ 3 (สารนิพนธ์). กรุงเทพฯ: มหาวิทยาลัยศรีนครินทรวิโรฒ.
สำนักงานเขตพื้นที่การศึกษามัธยมศึกษา. (2554). From http://plan.sesao1.go.th/school_size.php และ http://www.bopp-obec.info/home/?page_id=2113)
Carmines. & Mclver. (1981). Unidimensional scaling. Beverly Hill: Sage.
Davis, K. E., & Todd, M. L. (1982). Assessing friendship; Prototypes, paradigm cases, and relationship description. In S. Duck & D. Perlman (Eds.). Understanding personal relationships: An interdisciplinary approach (p. 17-38). London: Sage.
Harfield, E. (1984). The danger of intimacy. In V.Derlaka (Ed.). Communication, intimacy and close relationship (p. 207-220). New York: Praeger.
Joreskog & Sorbom. (1989): 23-28; Long. 1983: 61-64; Bollen. 1989: 256 -281, 335 -338
Maslow, Abraham H. (1954). Motivation and personality. New York: Harper & Row. 170.
Maslow, Abraham H. (1955). Deficiency motivation and growth motivation. Retrieved October 12, 2007.
Sternberg, R. J. (1988). The Triangle of love. New York: Basic Book
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Content and information of the article published at Suthiparithat Journal are based on the sole opinions and responsibility of author(s) only. Neither the editorial board involve in......
