RAMKHAMHAENG UNIVERSITY LECTURERS’ TEACHING STYLES WITH REGARD TO ACTIVE LEARNING

Authors

  • Busara Niyomves Lecturer and Ph.D., Graduate School, Ramkhamhaeng University
  • Sirirat Hitakowit Educational Evaluation and Research, Faculty of Education, Ramkhamhaeng University
  • Thayida Lertchana Ramkhamhaeng Demonstration School (Elementary Level), Ramkhamhaeng University
  • Suntana Sutadarat Associate Professor and Ph.D., Institute of International Studies, Ramkhamhaeng University

Keywords:

Active Learning, Learning Management

Abstract

In this survey research inquiry, the researchers investigated how much Ramkhamhaeng University lecturers incorporate active learning methods into their teaching, and compare these lecturers’ gender, educational level and teaching experience. Using Yamane’s method of sampling (Yamane, 1973, pp. 727-728), the researchers selected a sample population consisting of 290 lecturers. The research instrument was a questionnaire inquiring about their incorporation of active learning methods into their teaching. Following Cronbach’s method, the questionnaire was found to be reliable. Statistically analyzed by frequency percentage mean, standard deviation, independent t-test, one-way analysis of variance. Findings are as follows: 1) As a whole, the lecturers employed active learning methods at a high level. In individual areas, it was found that they were ranked from high to low in the following order: the lecturers, the content, the assessment and evaluation, instructional and supporting media, learning management, and students. 2) The comparisons of the lecturers’ gender, educational levels and teaching experience were found to be as follows: 2.1) Male lecturers incorporated active learning methods into their teaching more than their female counterparts. 2.2) Educational levels were not overall different, whereas the lecturers’ teaching experience were significantly different at 0.05 level.

References

กานต์ อัมพานนท์. (2561). การพัฒนารูปแบบการเรียนรู้เชิงรุกที่ส่งเสริมทักษะการคิด วิชาความเป็นครูสำหรับนักศึกษาคณะครุศาสตร์ มหาวิทยาลัยราชภัฏเพชรบูรณ์. วารสารราชภัฏเพชรบูรณ์สาร, 20(2), 87-101.

ประเสริฐ แก้วแจ่ม. (2547). ความสามารถพื้นฐานเพื่อการทำวิจัยในชั้นเรียนของครูช่างอุตสาหกรรมสังกัด กรมอาชีวศึกษา ในสถาบันการอาชีวศึกษาภาคตะวันออก (วิทยานิพนธ์ปริญญามหาบัณฑิต). ชลบุรี: มหาวิทยาลัยบูรพา.

พระราชบัญญัติการศึกษาแห่งชาติ พ.ศ. 2542. (2542). ราชกิจจานุเบกษา, 116(74ก), 1-23.

มัลลิกา เกตุชรารัตน์, พร้อมพิไล บัวสุวรรณ, และวิสุทธิ์ วิจิตรพัชราภรณ์. (2558). การศึกษาสมรรถนะที่พึงประสงค์ของอาจารย์มหาวิทยาลัยเกษตรศาสตร์. วารสารครุศาสตร์ จุฬาลงกรณ์มหาวิทยาลัย, 43(1), 112-127.

สุรางค์ โค้วตระกูล. (2548). จิตวิทยาการศึกษา (พิมพ์ครั้งที่ 6 ฉบับปรับปรุงแก้ไข). กรุงเทพฯ: ศูนย์หนังสือแห่งจุฬาลงกรณ์มหาวิทยาลัย.

Astin, A. W. (1985). Achieving educational excellence. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

Bloom, B. S. (Ed.). (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: Handbook 1: The cognitive domain. New York: Longman.

Bonwell, C. C., & Eison, J. A. (1991). Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom (ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report). Washington, DC: George Washington University, School of Education and Human Development. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED340272

Center for Educational Innovation. (2019). Active learning. Retrieved June 24, 2019, from https://cei.umn.edu/active-learning

Chickering, A. W., & Gamson, Z. F. (1987, March). Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. AAHE Bulletin, 39, 3-7. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED282491

Cross, K. P. (1987). Teaching for learning. AAHE Bulletin, 39(8), 3-7. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED283446

Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111

Piaget’s theory of cognitive development. (n.d.). Retrieved June 29, 2019, from http://www.massey.ac.nz/~wwpapajl/evolution/assign2/DD/theory.html

Progressive education. (n.d.). In Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved June 30, 2019, from https://www.britannica.com/topic/progressive-education

Slavin, R. E. (1995). Cooperative learning: Theory, research, and practice (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Weltman, D. (2007). A comparison of traditional and active learning methods: An empirical investigation utilizing a linear mixed model (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The University of Texas at Arlington.

Yamane, T. (1973). Statistics: An introductory analysis (3rd ed.). New York: Harper and Row.

Downloads

Published

2020-09-25

How to Cite

Niyomves, B., Hitakowit, S., Lertchana, T., & Sutadarat, S. (2020). RAMKHAMHAENG UNIVERSITY LECTURERS’ TEACHING STYLES WITH REGARD TO ACTIVE LEARNING. SUTHIPARITHAT JOURNAL, 34(111), 17–31. retrieved from https://so05.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/DPUSuthiparithatJournal/article/view/247151