Social identity influences millennials’ motivation for viewing online live streaming

Authors

  • Thanakarn Thanakiatpinyo Broadcasting and Streaming Media Production Department, School of Communication Arts, Bangkok University
  • Tashapon Prapanont Broadcasting and Streaming Media Production Department, School of Communication Arts, Bangkok University
  • Warin Pattarapatumthong Broadcasting and Streaming Media Production Department, School of Communication Arts, Bangkok University

Keywords:

Social Identity, Motivations for Viewing, Online Live Streaming, Millennial Consumer

Abstract

 

This study aims to investigate the social identity influences on millennials’ motivation for viewing online live streaming.  Data was collected by distributing questionnaires to a sample of 360 millennials aged between 25-40 years who have engaged in online live streaming. Multiple regression analysis was employed to analyze the data. The findings support the hypothesis, indicating that social identity significantly affects millennials’ motivation for viewing online live streaming at the 0.001 statistical significance level. Notably, the social identity variable with the highest impact on motivation for viewing online live streaming was broadcaster identification (Beta = .456), followed by group identification (Beta = .282). Both variables positively affect motivations for viewing online live streaming, with  broadcaster identification having the most substantial impact. These results demonstrate that all aspects of social identity influence motivations for viewing online live streaming, with broadcaster identification receiving the highest positive evaluation. Broadcaster identification, defined as the emotional connection and affinity viewers feel towards the live streamer, strongly influences the motivation for viewing. Millennials are particularly drawn to broadcasters who appear relatable, authentic, and engaging. This connection fosters trust and loyalty, leading viewers to continuously follow and interact with the streamer.

References

Cochran, W. G. (1977). Sampling techniques (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.

Dholakia, U. M., Bagozzi, R. P., & Pearo, L. K. (2004). A social influence model of consumer participation in network- and small-group-based virtual communities. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 21(3), 241-263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2003.12.004

Dimock, M. (2019, January 17). Defining generations: Where millennials end and generation Z begins. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2019/01/17/where-millennials-end-and-generation-z-begins

Hamilton, W. A., Garretson, O., & Kerne, A. (2014). Streaming on twitch: Fostering participatory communities of play within live mixed media. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1315-1324). https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557048

Haslam, S. A., Reicher, S. D., & Platow, M. J. (2020). The new psychology of leadership: Identity, influence, and power (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351108232

Helal, G., & Ozuem, W. (2019). Social media and social identity in the millennial generation. In Leveraging computer-mediated marketing environments (pp. 43-82). Business Science Reference. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-7344-9.ch003

Rubin, A. M. (2009). Uses-and-gratifications perspective on media effects. In J. Bryant & M. B. Oliver (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (pp. 165–184). Taylor & Francis.

Rubin, A. M., & Step, M. M. (2000). Impact of motivation, attraction, and parasocial interaction on talk radio listening. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 44(4), 635-654. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15506878jobem4404_7

Sjöblom, M., Törhönen, M., Hamari, J., & Macey, J. (2017). Content structure is king: An empirical study on gratifications, game genres, and content types on Twitch. Computers in Human Behavior, 73, 161-171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.03.036

Sunthornthai, W. (2008). The rationale behind the development of a 5-level decision-making criterion. Journal of Administrators, 28(3), 97–101. https://www.bu.ac.th/knowledgecenter/executivejournal/july_sep_08/july_sep_08.html

Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Brooks/Cole.

Wang, X., & Wu, D. (2019). Understanding user engagement mechanisms on a live streaming platform. In FH. Nah, & K. Siau, (Eds), HCI in business, government and organizations. Information systems and analytics. HCII 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 11589. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22338-0_22

Wohn, D. Y., Freeman, G., & McLaughlin, C. (2015). Explaining viewers’ emotional, instrumental, and financial support of live streamers. Proceedings of the 2018 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1-13). https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3173574.3174048

Yu, E., Jung, C., Kim, H., & Jung, J. (2018). Impact of viewer engagement on gift-giving in live video streaming. Telematics and Informatics, 35(5), 1450-1460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2018.03.014

กระทรวงดิจิทัลเพื่อเศรฐกิจและสังคม, สำนักงานสถิติแห่งชาติ. (2566). สำรวจการมีการใช้เทคโนโลยีสารสนเทศและการสื่อสารในสถานประกอบการ พ.ศ. 2565. ผู้แต่ง. https://www.nso.go.th/nsoweb/storage/survey_detail/2024/20231004084135_87842.pdf

Downloads

Published

2025-03-21

How to Cite

Thanakiatpinyo, T., Prapanont, T., & Pattarapatumthong, W. (2025). Social identity influences millennials’ motivation for viewing online live streaming. SUTHIPARITHAT JOURNAL, 39(1), 127–141. retrieved from https://so05.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/DPUSuthiparithatJournal/article/view/277051