Innovative Solution of Rural Thai Household Debts: Community Fund Management Center

Authors

  • Soontorn Koonchaimang College of Social Innovation, Rangsit University
  • Weeraboon Wisartsakul Puey Ungphakorn School of Development Studies, Thammasat University
  • Aree Kongjam Right Livelihood Foundation

Keywords:

Household debt, Community Fund Management Center, Community innovation, Community capability

Abstract

The objectives of this research were to 1) study the characteristics of debts and the needs for household spending in rural Thailand and to 2) identify the important success factors and driving factors in managing rural Thai household debts and in managing the economy; via collecting relevant documents, conducting in-depth interviews, arranging workshops and studying case studies.

The research results showed two main findings as follows: 1) The state of household debts was negatively correlated to the macro-economic debts. In other words, the household debt to household income ratio increased for rural Thai household. While three out of four community fund management centers that have been studied can reduce the ratio of household debt to household income to lower than the country’s average in 2019 at 24.6%. Only one center had household debt to household income ratio above the country’s average but it was considered much reduced.

2) There were three factors that contributed to the success that took place including (2.1) Strength in community organization which coordinated with the advice from the Community Development Department. (2.2) The cooperation between community financial institutes and the community fund management center and (2.3) The work procedures that integrate economical concepts into debt management, focusing on communicating and understanding the perspectives on debt management, daily spending on luxury goods that did not correspond to seasonal and price fluctuation of agricultural incomes.

The suggestions for household debt management and economy management include: (1) Practical measures which involve expanding the Community Fund Management Center project to cover the whole country. (2) Suggestions for the policies are to elevate the objective from managing household debts to “solving problems about poverty and building sustainable economy for low-income groups”, determining the policies for solving household debts in poor areas, and developing the role of the institute to develop local economy by utilizing lessons and experiences of the community fund management centers, in coordination with the relevant financial institutes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ชนาภิวัฒน์ ขันทะ และสุภาค์พรรณ ตั้งตรงไพโรจน์. (2564) หนี้ครัวเรือนไทยกับแนวทางแก้ไขให้ยั่งยืน.

วารสารศิลปศาสตร์และวิทยาการจัดการ, 8(1): 131-145

พลภัทร บุราคม. (2549) กระบวนทัศน์ใหม่ของการเจริญเติบโตทางเศรษฐกิจกับปัญหาด้านประสิทธิภาพ

ในการจัดสรรและการกระจายผลประโยชน์ของรายจ่ายสาธารณะของไทย.วารสารพัฒนบริหารศาสตร์ NIDA Development Journal, 46(2-4/2006), 19-56.

วีรบูรณ์ วิสารทสกุล และคณะ (2563) โครงการศึกษาความเป็นไปได้ในการพัฒนากลุ่มองค์กรฐานราก

เพื่อรองรับต่อการจัดการปัญหาความยากจนและความเหลื่อมล้ำ. เสนอ กรมการพัฒนาชุมชน,

สำนักงานศูนย์วิจัยและให้คำปรึกษาแห่งมหาวิทยาลัยธรรมศาสตร์.

Buchen, Teresa; Drometer, Marcus; Oesingmann, Katrin; Wollmershäuser, Timo (2016).

Managing Household Debt in Croatia, CESifo Forum, ISSN 2190-717X, ifo Institut –

Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung an der Universität München, München, Vol.

, Iss. 1, pp. 12-16

Cahn, E. (2000). No more throwaway people: the co-production imperative. Washington:

Essential Books.

International Monetary Fund. ( 2 0 1 2 ) . World Economic Outlook: Growth Resuming,

Dangers Remain. Washington: International Monetary Fund.

Johnson, C (2014). An Institutional theory of participatory budgeting, paper presented for

presentation at American Political Science Association Annual Meeting, August,28, 2014.

Olafsson Stefan. (2012). The Icelandic Way Out of the Crisis: Welfarism, redistribution

and austerity (Working paper). University of Liceland.

Ostrom, E. (1996). Crossing the Great Divide: Coproduction, Synergy, and Development. Word

Development, 24(6): 1073-1087

Saigaran, N. Karupiah, P., and Gopal, P. (2015). The capability approach: comparing

Amartya-Sen and Martha Nussbaum, USM international conference on social sciences (USM-ICOSS) 2015, 27th-28th August 2015.

Schumpeter, J. (1943). Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. London and New York

Routledge

Souza, C. (2001). Participatory budgeting in Brazilian cities: limits and possibilities in building

democratic institutions. Environment & Urbanization, 13(1): 159-189

Yunus, Muhammad & Jolis, Alan. (1999). Banker to the Poor: The Autobiography of

Muhammad Yunus, Founder of Grameen Bank. Bangladesh: PublicAffairs.

Yunus, Muhammad. (2016). Grameen bank: the struggle of Dr. Muhammad Yunus.

Dhaka: Adorn Publication.

Zabai, Anna. (2017). Household debt: recent developments and challenges. Basel: Bank of International Settlements

Downloads

Published

2022-12-27

How to Cite

Koonchaimang, S. ., Wisartsakul, W. ., & Kongjam, A. . (2022). Innovative Solution of Rural Thai Household Debts: Community Fund Management Center. PSDS Journal of Development Studies, Puey Ungphakorn School of Development Studies, Thammasat University, 5(2 กรกฎาคม - ธันวาคม), 1–25. retrieved from https://so05.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/gvc-tu/article/view/259545