Publication Ethics
Code of ethics of articles to be printed in the Articles of the Philosophy Perspective Journal
Editor's Roles and Duties
The editor is responsible for overseeing the management of journals in accordance with the criteria set by the Thai Academic Journal Citation Index Center (TCI).
No.1. Editors must have code of conduct or use academic rationale in considering articles without bias, without conflict of interest or redundant benefits with the author of the article.
No. 2. The editor must strictly select an article evaluator to have the knowledge and expertise that corresponds to that article. and must accept the article evaluation results from the article reviewers without modifying or modifying other texts other than those recommended by the article reviewer And do not use power or duty to overwhelm the article evaluator to evaluate the article as they want.
No.3. Editors should not accept articles that have not been evaluated by the article reviewers.
No.4. Editors must check for duplication of articles according to academic standards by using a reliable program that the articles submitted for publication in journals do not plagiarize others' works. If the work of others is plagiarized and must notify the article owner immediately If the author of the article does not comply with the recommendations, the editor can immediately reject the publication.
Article Author’s Role and Duty
No.1. The author of the article must certify that his work has never been published or published anywhere before. and must present the actual study results and the information of the work is not false.
No.2. The author of the article must not infringe copyright or copy the article or other person's work as his own work without conforming to the reference format of the work that meets the academic standards. and must pass a credible academic selection program
No.3. The author of the article must adjust or modify the published work in accordance with the publishing style and citation format of the source according to the format specified by the journal. and must modify the published work according to the recommendations or according to the article evaluation results from the editorial review panel. If not edited according to the instructions, the journal reserves the right not to publish your article. And the author of the article must agree that the article or the published work is the copyright of the journal and not to be published in other sources.
No.4. The author of the article must clearly state the source of the grant to support the article or academic work (if any).
No.5. The author of the article must comply with the conditions and recommendations of the journal within the period specified by the journal. and reserves the right not to accept your article for publication and not request a refund of the publishing fee in any case
The peer reviewer’s role and duty
No. 1. An article evaluator must evaluate the article within the time frame specified by the journal and must submit the completed article to the journal within 14 days from the date the article is received.
No.2. Article evaluators must take into account the quality of the article. by adhering to academic principles and in accordance with the objectives of the journal and must evaluate the articles strictly according to the journal's assessment model without any bias at all. and must have a code of ethics not to disclose information or the results of article evaluation to other departments or other persons.
No. 3. Article evaluators do not use any part of the content they evaluated as their own work without the consent of the article owner or the journal.
No. 4. Article evaluators must have knowledge, understanding and expertise in the content of the work they evaluate. If not, the assessor can refuse to evaluate the article. If you find content in an article that you self-assessed is duplicate or similar to the work of others.
No. 5. The article assessor must evaluate the article strictly according to the assessment form. If there is any suggestion that is in addition to the issues in the assessment form, it can be clearly presented in writing.
No.6. Article evaluators must not have duplicate interests or conflicts with the article's owner. If the editor knows later, he will cancel the assessment result and the journal reserves the right not to submit the article for you to evaluate next time.
