Participation in Academic Administration of teacher under Nakhon Ratchasima Primary Education Service Area Office 5

Abstract

This research aimed to 1) study the participation in academic administration of teachers under the Nakhon Ratchasima Primary Educational Service Area Office, District 5 2) to compare the participation in academic administration of teachers. Under the Nakhon Ratchasima Primary Educational Service Area Office, Region 5, classified by work experience 3) to study the guidelines for participation in academic administration of teachers under Nakhon Ratchasima Primary Educational Service Area Office, 5 in 2019, by using ready-made tables of Krejcie & Morgan, a research tool, as an estimation scale questionnaire. And interview form Data were analyzed by classified by work experience 3) to study the guidelines for participation in academic administration of teachers under the Nakhon Ratchasima Primary Educational Service Area Office, 5frequency, percentage (Percentage The sample is Teachers in the position of Head of Academic Affairs in Schools under), mean (), standard deviation (S.D.), one-way variance (One-way ANOVA) The results of the research were as follows: 1) The participation in academic administration of teachers under Nakhon Ratchasima Primary Education Service Area Office, District 5, overall was at a high level. 2) The results of comparison of participation in academic administration by work experience between less than 5 year, 5-10 year, and more than 10, overall and each aspect was no different. 3) Guidelines for participation in academic administration were found that 3.1) Making decision participation with teachers involved in the preparation of the academic calendar. In which the executives had a clarification meeting with stakeholders jointly set a framework for preparing an educational calendar. 3.2) operational participation The teachers were involved in the study of fundamental information, document analysis, core curriculum. The condition of community and local needs for the preparation of the school curriculum. The management has appointed a meeting committee. Plan basic information with regard to the context and needs of the community. 3.3) Receiving benefits participation, the educational institutions have clear tools for evaluating the results of internal supervision. The administrators set up an internal supervision committee for educational institutions. The Supervisory Table clearly defines the tools to assess supervision to improve and improve teacher work. In order to obtain the highest achievement of the learners. 3.4) Evaluation participation the teachers participated in the evaluation of the management system and information management structure to facilitate the development of the internal quality assurance system. In which the administrators held a meeting to plan teachers' operations in the preparation of quality assurance within educational institutions by setting the criteria and guidelines on quality assurance within educational institutions based on the principles of participation of teachers. And related agencies.