Development of Factors Affecting Servant Leadership of Secondary School Directors in the Lower Northern Region 1

Abstract

The purposes of this research were 1) to study the level of servant leadership of secondary school directors in the Lower Northern Region 1, 2) to study the level of factors affecting servant leadership of secondary school directors in the Lower Northern Region 1, 3) to study the factors affecting servant leadership of secondary school directors in the Lower Northern Region 1, and 4) to create guidelines for developing factors affecting servant leadership of secondary school directors in the Lower Northern Region 1. The school administration in Lower Northern Region 1 took the samples using a 50% stratified random sampling method of all school administrations. There were 360 informants in the Northeastern Region of Thailand. The instrument used in this study was a 5-level rating scale questionnaire with 30 samples. Part 2 of the questionnaire reliability value was between 0.791 and 0.918, and Part 3 was between 0.910 and 0.955. Data were analyzed by using mean, standard deviation, and stepwise multiple regressing analysis. 2) To study the guidelines for developing factors affecting servant leadership and assess their appropriateness by seven experts.

The research results were as follows: 1) The level of servant leadership among secondary school directors in the Lower Northern Region overall was at a high level. 2) The level of the factors affecting the servant leadership of secondary school directors in Lower Northern Region 1 overall was at a high level. 3. The factors affecting servant leadership. Reliability and vision were the factors affecting the servant leadership of secondary school directors in Lower Northern Region 1, which were statistically significant at the 0.01 level, with multiple correlations (R) of 7.54 and an adjusted coefficient (Adj R²) = .566. Standard Error (SE_b) = .044, two variables forecasted at 56.6%. 4. The guidelines for developing factors affecting servant leadership were two aspects: reliability and vision. The elements of the development guideline were determined to be at the most appropriate level based on the assessment of experts.